IPV4 to IPV6

How to add IPv6 over IPv4 support to your network behind a NAT router

Tukiyooo 0 IPv4, IPv4/IPv6, IPv6, router, Setup IPv6 19:12

<pre>Firewall+IPv6 Tunnel mini-HOWTO
Hernán Freschi <hjf(at)hjf.com.ar>
version 0.1, 2002-11-27

How to add IPv6 over IPv4 support to your network behind a NAT router.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

1.1 Copyright
     1.2 Disclaimer
     1.3 Credits
     1.4 Changelog
  
  2. What's IPv6? What can it do for me?

3. How do I connect to the 6bone?

4. What should I allow through the firewall?

5. Configuring the IPv6 machines/routers

5.1. Linux

5.2. Windows

5.2.1 IPv6 stand-alone machine
    5.2.2 IPv6 network
      5.2.2.1 The Router
      5.2.2.2 The clients

6. Examples
     6.1 Windows PC using IPv6, behind iptables NAT/MASQ, with a tunnel from HE.
     6.2 Multiple Windows PCs using IPv6, behind iptables NAT/MASQ, with a tunnel from BTExact.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Introduction

1.1 Copyright

This document is Copyright 2002 by Hernán Freschi. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license can be found at www.gnu.org.

1.2 Disclaimer 
Use the information in this document at your own risk. I disavow any potential liability for the contents of this document. Use of the concepts, examples, and/or other content of this document is entirely at your own risk.

All copyrights are owned by their owners, unless specifically noted otherwise. Use of a term in this document should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark.

Naming of particular products or brands should not be seen as endorsements.

You are strongly recommended to take a backup of your system before major installation and backups at regular intervals.

1.3 Credits

Hernán Freschi <hjf(at)hjf.com.ar>

Microsoft, Windows, 2000, XP, SP1, .NET Server 2003 are all trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Any comments or suggestions can be mailed to my mail address on: hjf(at)hjf.com.ar

This document is still in beta phase, so errors and omissions may be present.

1.4 Changelog

0.1 Initial Release.

Getting Started

2. What's IPv6? What can it do for me?

Sorry, that is beyond the scope of this document. This aims to make a iptables firewall to allow incoming traffic from an IPv6 tunnel.

3. How do I connect to the 6bone?

Through a tunnel broker!. Get your account (for free) at:

www.tunnelbroker.net (USA)
tb.ipv6.btexact.com (UK)
tb.ngnet.it (Italy?)

You could also use www.freenet6.net, but they use proprietary software, which doesn't run inside a network. But it's easier to implement and even assigns /48 subnets.

4. What should I allow through the firewall?

Everything that comes from the tunnel address, except ICMP (what for? let the linux box answer, so the packets dont get in the network). The rules I use are this:

iptables -A FORWARD -s <tunnel address> -p ! ICMP -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j DNAT --to <internal router address>

And that's it. The outgoing packets don't need special treatment.

Note: This, of course, assumes that your Linux firewall doesn't handle the IPv6 packets. It's designed to run on tiny distros like FloppyFW (www.zelow.no/floppyfw) or LRP (www.lrp.org). With this, the firewall doesn't need support for IPv6. These packets are handled in an internal, more powerful (ie: with a hard disk) computer.

5. Configuring the IPv6 machines/routers

5.1 Linux

I don't have a linux box to experiment, you can either
a) Donate a hard disk, so I can install linux again or
b) Write this section for me :)

5.2 Windows (2000/XP/XP-SP1/.NET Server 2003 ONLY! Win9x is UNSUPPORTED).

First of all, you have to install IPv6 support:

C:\> ipv6 install
Installing...

Success.

5.2.1 IPv6 stand-alone machine:

Use your brokers script! If they didn't provide one, use these:

ipv6.exe rtu ::/0 2/::<tunnel address>
ipv6.exe adu 2/<your ipv6 address>

The 2/ is the Interface Index. It's usually 2, but it may vary. If in doubt, type

ipv6 if

and look for a line like this:

Interface 2: Automatic tunnel pseudo-interface

The number, obviously, is the one you are looking for.

5.2.2 IPv6 network

(Note: this applies only to the external network. If you need help setting up the IPv6 lan, read www.microsoft.com/ipv6)

5.2.2.1 The Router

Use your brokers script! If they didn't provide one, use these:

ipv6.exe rtu ::/0 2/::<tunnel address>
ipv6.exe adu 2/<your ipv6 address>
ipv6.exe rtu <your ipv6 subnet>/<your ipv6 netmask> 4 pub life 86400
ipv6.exe ifc 2 forw
ipv6.exe ifc 3 forw
ipv6.exe ifc 4 forw adv

2, 3, 4 are the interface indices. They may vary. To find out, type

ipv6 if

5.2.2.2 The clients

You don't need to do nothing, they are auto configured.

6. Examples:

6.1 Windows PC using IPv6, behind iptables NAT/MASQ, with a tunnel from HE.

Equipment required:
1 Box capable of running iptables (kernel = 2.4.x)
1 Box running Microsoft® Windows 2000, Windows XP (SP1), Windows .NET Server 2003.

Tunnel:
1 /127 Allocation from Hurricane Electric

+---+ +---+ \/\/\/\/\/ +------+ /\/\/\/\/\
 |WIN|------------|FFW|-----------/INTERNET\---------|TUNNEL|----------\ 6bone /
 +---+ +---+ \/\/\/\/\/ +------+ /\/\/\/\/\
10.42.42.100<->10.42.42.1 <-> 209.13.122.2 <-> ipv6.he.net <-> 2001:470:1F00:FFFF::xxxx

Configuration:
On the Linux box type:

iptables -A FORWARD -s 64.71.128.82 -p ! ICMP -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 64.71.128.82 -i eth0 -j DNAT --to 10.42.42.100

On the MS box type:

ipv6 rtu ::/0 2/::64.71.128.82 pub
ipv6 adu 2/2001:470:1F00:FFFF::xxxx

Congratulations. You are set.

Now try pinging to 6bone.net, for example.

6.2 Multiple Windows PCs using IPv6, behind iptables NAT/MASQ, with a tunnel from BTExact.

Equipment required:
1 Box capable of running iptables (kernel = 2.4.x)
n Boxes running Microsoft® Windows 2000, Windows XP (SP1), Windows .NET Server 2003.

Tunnel:
1 /64 Allocation from Hurricane Electric

+---+ +---+ +---+
  |WIN| |WIN| |WIN|
  +---+ +---+ +---+
    +-----+-----+
  +---+            +---+           \/\/\/\/\/         +------+          /\/\/\/\/\
--|WRT|------------|FFW|-----------/INTERNET\---------|TUNNEL|----------\  6bone /
  +---+            +---+           \/\/\/\/\/         +------+          /\/\/\/\/\

10.42.42.100<->10.42.42.1 <-> 209.13.122.2 <-> 193.113.58.80 <-> 2001:618:400::xxxx:xxxx

Configuration:
On the Linux box type:

iptables -A FORWARD -s 64.71.128.82 -p ! ICMP -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 64.71.128.82 -i eth0 -j DNAT --to 10.42.42.100

On the MS router type:

ipv6.exe rtu ::/0 2/::193.113.58.80
ipv6.exe adu 2/2001:618:400::xxxx:xxxx
ipv6.exe rtu 2001:618:400:xxxx::/64 4 pub life 86400
ipv6.exe ifc 2 forw
ipv6.exe ifc 3 forw
ipv6.exe ifc 4 forw adv

On the other machines type:

Nothing, they are auto configured. If they dont work, try:

ipv6 reset

If that doesn't work, check for a default route (::/0).

ipv6 rt

If there isn't one, try adding one:

ipv6 rtu ::/0 n/(your routers ipv6 address)

(where n is the interface index of the ethernet board connected to the network, usually 4).

If it works, but the next time you reboot, it does not auto configure, then maybe you are not publishing the default route in the router.

Congratulations. You are set.

Now try pinging to 6bone.net, for example. 
</pre>

How to add IPv6 over IPv4 support to your network behind a NAT router

Firewall+IPv6 Tunnel mini-HOWTO Hernán Freschi <hjf(at)hjf.com.ar> version 0.1, 2002-11-27 How to add IPv6 over IPv4 support to your ...

IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6

Tukiyooo 0 DHCP, DHCPv6, IPv6, Setup IPv6 19:10

<pre>Network Working Group J. Durand
Internet-Draft GIP RENATER
Expires: August 19, 2005 February 18, 2005

IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6
           draft-jdurand-assign-addr-ipv6-multicast-dhcpv6-01

Status of this Memo

By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
   patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
   and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
   RFC 3668.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
   groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://
   www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on August 19, 2005.

Abstract

This document proposes a simple solution to solve IPv6 multicast
   address assignment problem using the DHCPv6 protocol.

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 1]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

Table of Contents

1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.1   IPv6 multicast deployment status . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.2   Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.3   SSM: no solution needed  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.4   Session announcement considerations  . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  State of the art for address assignment  . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Assignment with DHCPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     3.1   New DHCPv6 options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.1.1   IA_MA option for IPv6 Multicast Addresses  . . . . . .  4
       3.1.2   Scope Option for IPv6 multicast address  . . . . . . .  6
     3.2   Address timers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.3   Assignment of a multicast prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.4   Client and server behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   4.  Group-ID consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   5.  Deployment scenarios - Case studies  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     5.1   Scenario 1: Site deployment  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     5.2   Scenario 2: Campus deployment  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     5.3   Scenario 3: ISP deployment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6.  Security considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   7.  Acknowledgement  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   8.  Discussions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   9.  Changes from -00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   10.   References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   10.1  Normative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   10.2  Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
       Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
       Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 13

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 2]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

1.  Introduction

Embedded-RP [11] is the only available solution for IPv6 interdomain
   ASM. Embedded-RP requires an IPv6 multicast address assignment
   mechanism, as multicast addresses mapping to the RP cannot be guessed
   and manually built by users. This is depicted in section 2.1.2 of the
   IETF working group document draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch [13].

This document proposes a simple solution to assign IPv6 multicast
   addresses or prefixes using the DHCPv6 protocol [8].

1.1  IPv6 multicast deployment status

The document draft-jdurand-ipv6-multicast-ra [14] recalls the
   following:

"The deployment of IPv6 multicast is expanding. Some networks have
   already put the service in production. Some gateways have been
   deployed, making it possible to have interoperability between IPv4
   and IPv6 multicast. Some sites have even stopped IPv4 multicast, due
   to its complexity (due to NAT and MSDP for example) and only rely on
   IPv6 multicast, using the deployed gateways for interoperability with
   IPv4.

As of this writing, most sessions are created manually from
   unicast-prefix based address space [6], or use SDR to form a
   semi-random address. Nevertheless these addresses cannot fit with
   embedded-RP [11] which is the only existing solution for IPv6
   interdomain ASM.

Some people argue that SSM solves the problem but there is nowadays a
   demand from customers to be capable to have multicast sessions (both
   IPv4 and IPv6) with multiple sources (e.g., conferencing) and it is
   not clear how to achieve this with SSM. While "multiple-source SSM"
   could potentially be done with the aid of SIP or RTP, this does not
   exist yet, and a simple solution for ASM is needed."

1.2  Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].

1.3  SSM: no solution needed

In the SSM model, as the channel is defined by the tuple (source
   address , group address), a collision can only occur if a host would
   like to be a sender for 2 different groups having the same address.

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 3]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

Therefore, it is sufficient for a sender to choose different
   addresses for different channels, this is a decision local to the
   host. This document only considers the ASM model which is a bit more
   complex.

1.4  Session announcement considerations

This document does not address the session announcement problem. It
   only answers the question of large scale address assignemnt of IPv6
   multicast addresses. Announcement of the sessions can still be done
   using web pages, emails, directories, SAP, etc.

2.  State of the art for address assignment

MADCAP [2] solves, or could solve, the multicast address assignment
   problem for both IPv4 and IPv6. However, MADCAP is a fork of DHCP, it
   has only a couple of implementations which have not been widely
   deployed. We assume that a mechanism that would be a simple extension
   to a more widely available mechanism (DHCPv6) could be more deployed.

This proposal and draft-jdurand-ipv6-multicast-ra [14] simplify the
   assignment architecture since the unicast and multicast address
   assignment mechanisms become the same. We consider at this stage only
   IPv6 multicast since most of the key elements used are already
   defined, and interaction with IPv4 multicast is ensured. If felt
   needed by the community, this proposal could be extended to IPv4.

3.  Assignment with DHCPv6

3.1  New DHCPv6 options

This section introduces new options for IPv6 multicast address
   assignment with DHCPv6.

3.1.1  IA_MA option for IPv6 Multicast Addresses

RFC 3315 [8] defines the following options for Identity Associations
   (IA):

o  IA_NA option for Non temporary Addresses

o  IA_TA option for Temporary Addresses

This document introduces a third option: the IA_MA option for IPv6
   Multicast Addresses. This option is used to carry an IA_MA, the
   parameters associated with the IA_MA, and the addresses associated
   with the IA_MA. The format of the IA_MA option is:

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 4]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

0                   1                   2                   3
          0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |          option-code          |          option-len           |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                        IAID (4octets)                         |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                                                               |
         .                         IA_MA-options                         .
         .                                                               .
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

option-code: OPTION_IA_MA (TBD)

option-len: 4 + length of IA_MA-options field

IAID: The unique identifier for this IA_MA; the IAID must be unique
      among the identifiers for all of this client's IA_MAs. The number
      space for IA_MA IAIDs is separate from the number space for IA_NA
      and IA_TA IAIDs

IA_MA-Options: Options associated with this IA_MA

The IA_MA-options field encapsulates those options that are specific
   to this IA_MA. For example, all of the IA Address Options carrying
   the multicast addresses associated with this IA_MA are in the
   IA_MA-options field.

Each IA_MA carries one "set" of multicast addresses; that is, at most
   one address per session created by the client requiring an address.

An IA_MA option may only appear in the options area of a DHCP
   message. A DHCP message may contain multiple IA_MA options. The
   status of any operations involving this IA_MA is indicated in a
   Status Code option in the IA_MA-options field.

Note that an IA has no explicit "lifetime" or "lease length" of its
   own. When the valid lifetimes of all of the addresses in an IA_MA
   have expired, the IA can be considered as having expired.

An IA_MA option does not include values for T1 and T2 (see RFC 3315
   [8]). A client MAY request that the lifetimes of multicast addresses
   be extended by including the addresses in a IA_MA option sent in a
   Renew or Rebind message to a server. For example, a client would
   request an extension on the lifetime of a multicast address to allow
   an application to continue a multicast session.

The client obtains new multicast addresses by sending an IA_MA option

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 5]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

with a new IAID to a server. The server will generate new multicast
   addresses and return them to the client. In case the clients needs to
   extend the multicast session, it sends a Renew message to the server
   with the IA_MA and addresses in parameters.

3.1.2  Scope Option for IPv6 multicast address

The scope option for IPv6 multicast addresses is used by the clients
   to request multicast addresses with a certain scope. It is included
   in the IA address option IAaddr-options field defined in section 22.5
   of RFC 3315 [8]. A user can attach more than one scope option for
   IPv6 multicast address to an IA address option if the client does not
   know exactely the scope it wants to request but has a set of adequate
   scope values.

0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         OPTION_SCOPE          |          option-len           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | scope |  res  |
       +-+-+-+-+-------+

option-code: OPTION_SCOPE (TBD)

option-len: 1

scope: The scope value for the requested IPv6 multicast address,
      according to values defined in RFC 3513 [9]

res: This field is reserved for future use. The 4 bits of this field
      MUST be set to 0, and MUST be ignored on receipt

3.2  Address timers

NOTE: There have been some discussions about using some options for
   the timers. This is let to next releases of the document as this
   release really focuses on why an assignment based on DHCPv6 has an
   interest.

The IA address option defined in RFC 3315 [8] contains the following
   32 bits fields:

o  preferred-lifetime: The preferred lifetime for the IPv6 address in
      the option, expressed in units of seconds

o  valid-lifetime: The valid lifetime for the IPv6 address in the

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 6]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

option, expressed in units of seconds

We suggest to use these fields, usually defined for unicast
   addresses, for IPv6 multicast addresses, with the definition written
   above.

The maximum value for these lifetimes is 2^32 seconds or 49710 days
   equivalent to 136 years. Therefore a host that wants to be assigned
   an address for a 2 days session occuring in 30 days can request an
   address with a preferred lifetime value of 32 days. According to the
   IPv6 multicast addressing space available, servers should allow this
   type of requests, or at least should permit a certain number of
   long-term assignment per host. The address is directly assigned by
   the DHCP server when the request is received. We suggest here not
   using the parameters minDesiredStartTime and maxDesiredStartTime
   specified in RFC 2771 [3] which bring too much complexity for the
   assignment and don't really make sense for IPv6 where many addresses
   are available.

3.3  Assignment of a multicast prefix

The assignment of a multicast prefix can be needed in the following
   scenarios:

o  An ISP needs to assign a block of IPv6 multicast address to an
      enterprise, assigning IPv6 multicast addresses to its hosts. This
      scenario will most likely occur when DHCPv6 prefix delegation [10]
      is already used to assign unicast prefixes to the enterprise.

o  Also it is most likely that the multicast applications will not
      support at the beginning the API to request for an IPv6 multicast
      address via DHCPv6. Then, on startup, or when connected to a new
      network, a host could ask for an IPv6 multicast prefix.
      Applications could then choose locally multicast addresses in the
      prefix assigned to the host.

To fulfill this need, the prefix delegation mechanism described in
   RFC 3633 [10] is needed also for multicast prefixes. The actual
   specifications of the IPv6 prefix Options for DHCPv6 do not need to
   be changed to support multicast prefix delegations. The only thing to
   keep in mind is that multicast prefix delegation can also occur
   between a router and a host to fulfill the second requirement
   mentioned above.

3.4  Client and server behavior

The procedures to request an IPv6 multicast address is more or less
   the same than the ones described in RFC 3315 [8] to request a

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 7]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

temporary IPv6 address. The differences are following:

o  The client uses IA-type IA_MA described above to ask for IPv6
      multicast addresses.

o  The client SHOULD use the Scope Option in solicit and request
      messages to tell the server the scope wanted for the IPv6
      multicast address requested. It can include more than one Scope
      Option for IPv6 multicast address per addresses requested in case
      the client does not know exactly the scope it wants to request but
      has a set of adequate scope values.

o  The client SHOULD specify the lifetimes for every address it wants
      to be assigned in solicit, request, renew and rebind messages.

o  The server MUST assign addresses only if it can assign an address
      matching one of the scope requested. In case the server can't
      assign an address with the requested scopes, it must include the
      Status Code Option NoAddrsAvail in the advertise and reply
      messages and should include a status message with the scopes that
      can be assigned by the server and their description.

o  If no scope option is specified by the client, the server can
      assign a multicast address with any scope. It can be a default
      scope value configured by the DHCP server administrator.

4.  Group-ID consideration

RFC 3307 [7] defines guidelines for the choice of IPv6 multicast
   group identifier (the last 32 bits of the IPv6 multicast address). It
   specifies that for dynamic IPv6 multicast address allocation, the
   group-ID MUST be in the range 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFF.

5.  Deployment scenarios - Case studies

This section gives examples of DHCPv6 deployments for IPv6 multicast
   address assignment.

5.1  Scenario 1: Site deployment

Consider a site having configured a DHCPv6 server and having one RP
   for a site-local scope (scope 5). In this simple scenario, the DHCPv6
   server can assign the complete set of addresses with a site-local
   scope.

We have the same scenario if the site configures one RP for global
   scope with embedded-RP technology. The DHCPv6 server of the site can

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 8]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

assign the complete set of addresses derived from the RP's address
   (see Embedded-RP [11]).

5.2  Scenario 2: Campus deployment

Consider a campus having configured one DHCPv6 server for the entire
   site, and having several labs (in different subnets) having each a
   multicast scope for their own usage. Every lab might have for example
   a scope admin-local (scope 4), and the campus may have the scope
   site-local (scope 5). The problem of the DHCPv6 server is to assign
   appropriate addresses to each of the labs.

The server can retrieve information about the location of the client
   according to the explanation given in section 11 of RFC 3315 [8]. The
   server can determine this way in which lab the client is and assign
   adequate addresses. This way a server can assign the same address
   twice to different clients in different labs.

5.3  Scenario 3: ISP deployment

Consider an ISP providing a global RP service to its customers. The
   ISP decided to use embedded-RP technology for this RP. Every
   customers having configured a DHCPv6 server would like to assign IPv6
   multicast addresses based on the RP of their ISP. The problem is to
   avoid overlap between addresses assigned by every DHCPv6 servers.

In this scenario, the ISP having configured an RP would allocate a
   range of IPv6 multicast addresses based on its RP to every customer
   having subscribed for the service (as explained in section 5.2 of
   Embedded-RP [11]). This allocation could be typically hand-off
   allocation, as it is done between ISP and big customers (not
   end-users at home) for unicast or could be done with DHCPv6 prefix
   delegation as explained in this document. This way, every DHCPv6
   server is then configured with a different multicast address range,
   all matching the same RP. This means that ISPs need to allocate IPv6
   multicast addresses to their customers, as they do today for IPv6
   unicast. Address allocation architectures are exactly the same.
   Nevertheless, we can note that any customer could deploy its own
   embedded-RP rather than using the one of its ISP, which simplifies
   this scenario.

6.  Security considerations

The security considerations related to the DHCPv6 protocol are
   discussed in the security considerations section of [8].

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                 [Page 9]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

7.  Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Bernard Tuy, Stig Venaas, Christian
   Strauf, Pekka Savola and Dave Thaler for their good contributions to
   this memo. The author would also like to thank Ralph Droms who took
   time to consider the IPv6 multicast assignment problem and introduced
   the concept of the identity association for IPv6 multicast addresses.
   The author would also like to thank all the people having worked on
   the 6NET Deliverable 3.4.3 [12], which was the initial document that
   raised the complete problematic of IPv6 multicast address assignment.

Pekka Savola, Dave Thaler, Stig Venaas and Bernard Tuy have
   contributed to better state the problem and mention why the proposal
   is of interest.

8.  Discussions

Here are the current discussions and questions about this document:

o  Timers could be specified with a new DHCPv6 option rather than
      overloading the timers of the address

o  If the server cannot assign addresses for the required scopes, it
      could assign an address in any other scope it is configured for.

9.  Changes from -00

o  Clarification of the need for the proposal

o  The multicast address assignment state of the art is now let to
      ID.draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch [13].

o  IPv6 multicast prefix delegation is now supported by this
      mechanism, from comments received in IETF 60th.

10.  References

10.1  Normative references

[1]   S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
         Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.

[2]   S. Hanna, B. Patel and M. Shah, "Multicast Address Dynamic
         Client Allocation Protocol (MADCAP)", RFC 2970, December 1999.

[3]   R. Finlayson, "An Abstract API for Multicast Address

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                [Page 10]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

Allocation", RFC 2771, February 2000.

[4]   M. Handley, C. Perkins and E. Whelan, "Session Announcement
         Protocol (SAP)", RFC 2974, October 2000.

[5]   D. Meyer and P. Lothberg, "GLOP Addressing in 233/8", RFC 3180,
         September 2001.

[6]   B. Haberman and D. Thaler, "Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast
         Addresses", RFC 3306, August 2002.

[7]   B. Haberman, "Allocation Guidelines for IPv6 Multicast
         Addresses", RFC 3307, August 2002.

[8]   R. Droms, J. Bound, B. Volz, T. Lemon, C. Perkins and M.
         Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6
         (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.

[9]   R. Hinden and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
         Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003.

[10]  O. Troan, R. Droms, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host
         Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633, December
         2003.

[11]  P. Savola and B. Haberman, "Embedding the Rendezvous Point (RP)
         Address in an IPv6 Multicast Address", November 2004.

10.2  Informative references

[12]  6NET project partners, "6NET D3.4.3 - IPv6 multicast address
         allocation study", May 2003.

[13]  P. Savola, "Overview of the Internet Multicast Addressing
         Architecture", November 2004.

[14]  J. Durand and P. Savola, "RA for IPv6 multicast prefixes",
         February 2005.

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                [Page 11]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

Author's Address

Jerome Durand
   GIP RENATER
   151 Bd de l'Hopital
   Paris  75013
   France

Phone: +33 1 53 94 20 30
   EMail: Jerome.Durand@renater.fr

Durand                  Expires August 19, 2005                [Page 12]
 
Internet-Draft    IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6        February 2005

Intellectual Property Statement

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
   on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in IETF Documents can
   be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Disclaimer of Validity

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

Acknowledgment

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.</pre>

IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6

Network Working Group J. Durand Internet-Draft GIP RE...

Converting IPv4 addresses to IPv6 addresses

Tukiyooo 0 Converting, Easy Explanation Of IPv4, Internet Protocol Version4 and IPv6, IPv4, IPv4/IPv6, Setup IPv6 19:08

Converting IPv4 addresses to IPv6 addresses
 
-------------------------------------------
 
Here's a cool tool for doing it in windows:
 
<a href="http://www.softpedia.com/get/network-tools/ip-tools/ipconvert.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.softpedia.com/get/Network-Tools/IP-Tools/IPConvert.shtml</a>

Here's the main ipv6 website:

There's a good read at Microsfoft on tcp/ip
 
fundamentals and subnetting:

<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/network/evaluate/" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/network/evaluate/</a>
 
technol/tcpipfund/tcpipfund_ch04.mspx#EEIAG

Here are some OpenBSD related sites:

<a href="http://www.inet6.dk/config/openbsd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.inet6.dk/config/openbsd.html</a>
 
<a href="http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/firewalls/807.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/firewalls/807.php</a>

I'm sure there are scads more. Google is your friend! ;)

Here are a few more, more general or linux:

<a href="http://enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3634596" rel="nofollow">http://enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3634596</a>
 
<a href="http://enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3629546" rel="nofollow">http://enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3629546</a>
 
<a href="http://enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3633211" rel="nofollow">http://enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsp/article.php/3633211</a>

The examples below are pretty simple Class C
 
network examples. I put several sequential
 
addresses in order to show the progression
 
in IPv6 notation.

--------------------------------------------
 
IPV4 Address: 192.168.1.100

IPV6 Address:

IPv6 Full Address
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:C0A8:0164

IPv6 Shorthand Adress:
 
::C0A8:0164

IPv6 & Dot Notation Full Address:
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:192.168.1.100

IPv6 & Dot Notation Shorthand Adress:
 
192.168.1.100
 
--------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------
 
IPV4 Address: 192.168.1.101

IPV6 Address:

IPv6 Full Address
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:C0A8:0165

IPv6 Shorthand Adress:
 
::C0A8:0165

IPv6 & Dot Notation Full Address:
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:192.168.1.101

IPv6 & Dot Notation Shorthand Adress:
 
192.168.1.101
 
--------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------
 
IPV4 Address: 192.168.1.102

IPV6 Address:

IPv6 Full Address
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:C0A8:0166

IPv6 Shorthand Adress:
 
::C0A8:0166

IPv6 & Dot Notation Full Address:
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:192.168.1.102

IPv6 & Dot Notation Shorthand Adress:
 
192.168.1.102
 
--------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------
 
IPV4 Address: 192.168.1.103

IPV6 Address:

IPv6 Full Address
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:C0A8:0167

IPv6 Shorthand Adress:
 
::C0A8:0167

IPv6 & Dot Notation Full Address:
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:192.168.1.103

IPv6 & Dot Notation Shorthand Adress:
 
192.168.1.103
 
--------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------
 
IPV4 Address: 192.168.1.104

IPV6 Address:

IPv6 Full Address
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:C0A8:0168

IPv6 Shorthand Adress:
 
::C0A8:0168

IPv6 & Dot Notation Full Address:
 
0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:192.168.1.104

IPv6 & Dot Notation Shorthand Adress:
 
192.168.1.104
 
----------------------

Converting IPv4 addresses to IPv6 addresses

Converting IPv4 addresses to IPv6 addresses ------------------------------------------- Here's a cool tool for doing it in windows: h...

How To Setup IPv6

Tukiyooo 0 Internet Protocol Version4 and IPv6, IPv6, Setup IPv6 19:05

<pre>Introduction
************

IPv6 (Internet Protocol Version 6) is the successor, respectively the
replacement, of the current version Internet Protocol, IPv4. The main
problem using IPv4 is the growing shortage of IPv4 Addresses caused by
the growing number of machines added to the internet.

IPv6 fixes a number of problems in IPv4, such as the limited number of
available IPv4 addresses. It also adds many improvements to IPv4 in areas
such as routing and network autoconfiguration. IPv6 is expected to
gradually replace IPv4, with the two coexisting for a number of years
during a transition period.

For this reason ePages supports IPv6 in version 6.0.6 and higher.

Requirements
************

- ePages 6.0.6 or higher
- License containing IPv6 address
- Linux kernel 2.6
- Windows 2003 Server 32 Bit or Windows 2008 Server

Prerequisites - Linux
=====================

- Check if the network interface supports IPv6:

ip -6 addr show

If command returns nothing or an error occurs, ask your system
  administrator to add the IPv6 network interface (ip -6 addr add ...).

- Check if the firewall allows IPv6 connections:

PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin iptables -L

If not, ask your system administrator to change the firewall settings.

- If you use your own web server (not the web server that comes with
  ePages) and you want to use IPv6 for the web server, check the Listen
  directive in the configuration file (usually httpd.conf). Use 'Listen
  80' (or other port), not 'Listen 0.0.0.0:80' (then only IPv4 is supported).

Prerequisites - Windows
=======================

- Enable IPv6 in Windows OS:

Control Panel -> Network Connections -> Local Area Connection -> Properties
  -> Install... -> Protocol (Add) -> Microsoft TCP/IP version 6

- Check if the firewall allows IPv6 connections:

Control Panel -> Windows Firewall

- The IIS has to be unconnected or assigned to the correct IPv6 address if the
  IIS should run with IPv6:

Administrative Tools -> IIS Manager -> Default Web Site
   -> IP Address (All Unassigned)

IPv6 Activation
***************

Activate IPv6 either in the setup process or after the setup
process. Windows only supports IPv6 activation after setup, skip to the
respective section.

IPv6 Activation in Setup - Linux
================================

This section shows how to IPv6 during the setup. This works only for
Linux, not for Windows. See section 'IPv6 Activation after Setup' if you
want to enable IPv6 in ePages on Windows.

Enable IPv6 by customizing your install.cnf file prior the installation
process. You can skip the section
"Post Installation" then.

- The installation is defined in "install.cnf".
- Append either ":ip6" to the hostname entry (the hostname has to be resolvable
 to an IPv6 address) or use an IPv6 address directly.
- If IPv6 doesn't work on this machine the installation starts using IPv4.
- If <hostname>:ip6 doesn't resolve to an IPv6 address the installation routine
 will try to get an IPv4 address for that hostname and use that one.
- If that fails too the address ::1 will be used.

IPv6 Activation After Setup
===========================

Environment Variables
---------------------

Windows:

Set EPAGES_ENABLE_IPv6=1. The environment variable EPAGES_IPLIST must
  contain the IPv6 address or the hostname (whether you use IPv6
  addresses or hostnames in Webinterface.conf) if EPAGES_IPBINDING is
  set.

- Click the right mouse key on the "My computer" icon.
  - Choose "Properties".
  - On the tab "Advanced" click "Environment variables".
  - To create the variable click "New", then enter name (EPAGES_ENABLE_IPv6)
    and value (1) and save with "OK".
  - If the environment variable already exists, choose the variable from
    the list, click "Edit", enter the new value (1) and save with "OK".
  - Change EPAGES_IPLIST in the same way (if necessary).
  - Reboot the server to take effect of the new variable.

Linux:

Set EPAGES_ENABLE_IPv6=1. The environment variable LOCAL_IPS must
  contain the IPv6 address or the hostname (whether you use IPv6
  addresses or hostnames in Webinterface.conf) if IP_BINDING is set.

- Add line "export EPAGES_ENABLE_IPv6=1" to the configuration file
    "/etc/default/epages6".
  - Change EPAGES_IPLIST in "/etc/default/epages6" if necessary.

If EPAGES_ENABLE_IPv6 is unset or 0, application server and request
router only support IPv4. In this case, if application server or request
router are configured to IPv6 in WebInterface.conf, errors will occur.

Host Names and Addresses
------------------------

If a host name is resolved to both IPv4 and IPv6, then the IPv6 address
is used if EPAGES_ENABLE_IPv6=1, otherwise the IPv4 address.

In Windows, "localhost" is resolved to both 127.0.0.1 and ::1.
In Linux, "localhost" is resolved to 127.0.0.1 and "ipv6-localhost" is
resolved to ::1.

If IP binding isn't used, a server can be connected with IPv6 and IPv4
clients if the server is set to IPv6 and has an IPv4 address too.

WebInterface.conf
-----------------
  
All IPv4 addresses can be replaced by IPv6 addresses or relevant host
names. The hostname must be short (without ".") or the result of the
command `hostname --fqdn`.

In section "URLRewrite", line ExceptionHost, an IPv6 address has to be
added in squared brackets, e.g.:

[URLRewrite]
  ExceptionHost=shop.domain.ex [2001:4bd8:2:2:213:d3ff:fe62:f1f0]

When using IP-Masks the part of the IP following the wildcard ("*") will
be truncated and is considered as the beginning of the IP to be
tested. IPv6 masks must be written in short form, i.e.:
- Left-hand zeros have to be written
- Zero blocks have to be shorten to ::

In case of a mixed IPv4/IPv6 communication beside the IPv4 mask the IPv4
mask in IPv6 notation must also exist, e.g. ::ffff:172.20.24.*.

If you use host names in WebInterface.conf, the corresponding IP entry or
IP mask must also exit.

Host masks as follows are not allowed: [*.epages.de]

epages.conf
-----------

IPv6 addresses can be entered in addition to IPv4 addresses and domain names.

Sybase Configuration
--------------------

Thy Sybase interfaces file (Linux: $SYBASE/interfaces; Windows:
%SYBASE%\ini\sql.ini) may contain IPv4 addresses, IPv6 addresses or host
names.

For Windows, Sybase recommends to use IPv6 addresses instead of host names, see
http://infocenter.sybase.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.sybase.dc38421_1500/html/ntconfig/X36043.htm.
Hostnames will be resolved to IPv4 addresses on Windows, i.e. IPv4 is
used if host names are entered in "sql.ini".

If you want to support IPv4 and IPv6, you will need to have entries for
both protocols, e.g.:

DBServer
    master tcp ether revival.sybase.com 17100
    query tcp ether revival.sybase.com 17100
    master tcp ether revival.v6.sybase.com 17100
    query tcp ether revival.v6.sybase.com 17100
 
The "*.res" files in $Sybase/ASE-15_0 can contain IPv6 addresses.

Start ePages with IPv6
**********************

Windows hosts must be rebooted to take effect of the changes.

After starting ePages, check if the services run with IPv6:

Windows:
  netstat -a -n | perl -ne "s/ +/ /g; /TCP.*LISTENING/ && print"

Linux:
  netstat -tulpn

If the web server runs with IPv6, you can use the IPv6 address in square
brackets in the URL, e.g.:

http://[2001:4bd8:2:2:2e0:7dff:fe76:8613]:80/WebRoot/WebAdapterError.html
</pre>

How To Setup IPv6

Introduction ************ IPv6 (Internet Protocol Version 6) is the successor, respectively the replacement, of the current version Interne...

A Communication Mechanism between IPv4 and IPv6

Tukiyooo 0 Communication, Internet Protocol Version4 and IPv6, IPv4, IPv4/IPv6 19:02

<pre>Expires in six month K. Watanabe, Hitachi
 Y. Atarashi, Hitachi
 T. Miyamoto, Hitachi
 K. Yamamoto, NAIST
 J. Murai, Keio University

A Communication Mechanism between IPv4 and IPv6

<draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt>

Status of this Memo

This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
    documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
    and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
    working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
    months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
    at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
    reference material or to cite them other than as ``work in
    progress.''

To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
    ``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-Drafts
    Shadow Directories on ds.internic.net (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net
    (Europe), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific
    Rim).

Abstract

In the late stage of the transition from IPv4 to IPv6, IPv4 lands
    are interconnected by IPv6 ocean and it is necessary for an IPv4
    node and an IPv6 to communicate directly. This memo proposes a
    mechanism to enable such direct communication with extension name
    servers, an address mapper, and translators for each IPv4 land.

1. Introduction

RFC1933 [TRANS-MECH] proposed mechanisms to transit IPv4 [IPv4] to
    IPv6 [IPv6], including dual stack and tunneling, for the early
    stage. IPv6 nodes are assumed to have IPv4 stack and IPv4 addresses.
    In the late stage of the transition, however, the space of IPv4

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 1]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

address will be exhausted. So, an IPv4 address cannot be assigned to
    dual-stack hosts. Moreover, IPv6-only hosts will appear for cost
    reasons. It is expected that IPv4 hosts will retain for a long time,
    even after appearance of IPv6-only hosts. Therefore, it is highly
    desired to develop a mechanism to enable a communication between an
    IPv4 host and an IPv6 host directly.

Though a header conversion mechanism is defined in [HDRCNV],
    interaction for an IPv4 host, an IPv6 host, a header conversion
    router, and name servers is not mentioned. This memo describes an
    entire scheme of direct communications between IPv4 hosts and IPv6
    hosts. The scheme is applicable to environments where there are
    multiple name servers and multiple site boundary routes thanks to
    one "address mapper".  It is not necessary to modify IPv4 hosts and
    IPv6 hosts.

This document uses the words defined in [IPV4], [IPV6], and
    [TRANS-MECH].

2. Components

In the late stage of the transition, IPv4 "land"s are interconnected
    by IPv6 "ocean". A set of IPv4-only nodes in an organization is an
    example of IPv6 island.

The proposed system consists of extension name servers, one address
    mapper, and translators. To implement communication between IPv4
    nodes and IPv6 nodes, each IPv4 island needs to install such
    components.

Extension name servers have both IPv4 stack and IPv6 stack and
    provides name service to IPv4 nodes and IPv6 nodes. Translators also
    have dual-stack functionality and translates "language" of IPv4
    nodes and that of IPv6 nodes. The address mapper is communicates
    only with the extension name servers and the translators.

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 2]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

Figure 1 illustrates an IPv4 land which installed the proposed
    system.

+---------+                                +-------- //
      |IPv4 node|                                |
      +----+----+                                |
           |                                     |
    +------+------+                              |
    |             |                              |
    |An IPv4 land |                              | IPv6 ocean
    |             |                              |
    |             |  +------------------------+  |         +---------+
    |             +--+ extension name servers +--+         |IPv6 node|
    |             |  +------------+-----------+  |         +---------+
    |             |               |              |
    |             |  +------------+-----------+  |         +---------+
    |             |  |   one address mapper   |  |         |IPv6 node|
    |             |  +------------+-----------+  |         +---------+
    |             |               |              |
    |             |  +------------+-----------+  |         +---------+
    |             +--+       translators      +--+         |IPv6 node|
    |             |  +------------------------+  |         +---------+
    |             |                              |
    +------+------+                              |
           |                                     |
      +----+----+                                |
      |IPv4 node|                                +-------- //
      +---------+

Figure 1

2.1 Translator between IPv4 and IPv6

The followings are examples of Translator between IPv4 and IPv6.

(1) Proxy gateway

An proxy gateway locates between an IPv4 host and an IPv6 host
        and establishes both an IPv4 connection to the IPv4 host and an
        IPv6 connection to the IPv6 host. The proxy gateway relays data
        from the IPv4 host to the IPv6 host and vice versa.

(2) Header conversion router

A header conversion router locates between an IPv4 host and an

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 3]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

IPv6 host. When the router receives an IPv4 packet, the router
        converts its IPv4 header to an IPv6 header then forwards it.
        When the router receives an IPv6 packet, the router converts its
        IPv6 header to an IPv4 header then fragments the packet if
        necessary and forwards it.

2.2 Extension Name Server

Extension name servers returns a "proper" answer in a response to
    IPv4 node's request or IPv6 node's request.

An IPv4 node typically requests one of extension name servers to
    resolve 'A' record correspond to a host name. If 'A' record is
    resolved, the server returns it. If only 'AAAA' record is available,
    the server requests an address mapper to assign one IPv4 address
    correspond to its IPv6 address. Then the server returns the assigned
    IPv4 address to the IPv4 node.

An IPv6 node typically requests one of extension name servers to
    resolve 'AAAA' record correspond to a host name. If 'AAAA' record is
    resolved, the server returns it. If only 'A' record is available,
    the server requests the address mapper to assign one IPv6 address
    correspond to its IPv4 address. Then the server returns the assigned
    IPv6 address to IPv6 node.

2.3 Address Mapper

An address mapper maintains an IPv4 address spool and an IPv6
    address spool. An example of the IPv4 address spool is private
    addresses(e.g number 10). An example of the IPv6 address spool is a
    part of IPv6 space assigned to the organization where the IPv4 land
    locates inside.

When an extension name server or a translator requests one IPv6
    address for an IPv4 address, the address mapper selects one IPv6
    address from the IPv6 address spool and returns it.

When an extension name server or a translator requests one IPv4
    address for an IPv6 address, the address mapper selects one IPv4
    address from the IPv4 address spool and returns it.

3. Interaction Examples

The following subsection explains communication from an IPv4 node to
    an IPv6 node and communication from an IPv6 node to an IPv4 node,
    respectively.

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 4]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

3.1 Communication from an IPv4 node to an IPv6 node

This subsection describes communication between an IPv4 node called
    "host4" and an IPv6 node called "host6". The communication is
    triggered by "host4".

"host4" sends a query to an extension name server to resolves 'A'
    record for "host6".

The extension name server tries resolving both 'A' record and 'AAAA'
    record for "host6" but only 'AAAA' record is resolved. Then the
    server requests an address mapper to assign one IPv4 address
    correspond to the IPv6 address.

The address mapper selects one IPv4 address out of its IPv4 address
    spool and returns it to the server.

The server creates 'A' record for the assigned IPv4 address and
    returns it to "host4".

"host4" sends IPv4 data to "host6".

The IPv4 data reaches a translator. The translator tries translating
    the IPv4 data to IPv6 data but does not know how to translate. (For
    example, a proxy gateway cannot create an IPv6 connection to "host6"
    since the IPv6 address of "host6" is not available.)  So, the
    translator requests the mapper to tell mapping entries for the IPv4
    source address and the IPv4 destination address.

The mapper looks up its mapping table with the IPv4 destination
    address and finds one IPv6 address for it. Then the mapper looks up
    its mapping table with the IPv4 source address. In this case, there
    is not a mapping entry so the mapper selects one IPv6 address for
    the IPv4 source address. Finally, the mapper returns a pair of the
    IPv6 source address and the IPv6 destination address to the
    translator.

The translator translates the IPv4 data to IPv6 data. (For example,
    the proxy gateway creates one IPv6 connection to "host6" and relay
    the IPv4 data.)

The IPv6 data reaches "host6". "host6" sends new IPv6 data to
    "host4".

The IPv6 data reaches the translator. This time the translator has
    mapping entries for the IPv6 source address and the IPv6 destination

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 5]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

address. The translator translates the IPv6 data to IPv4 data. (For
    example, the proxy gateway just relays the data.)

The IPv4 data reaches "host4".

The following diagram illustrates the interaction above:

IPv4    extension      address    translator    IPv6
        node    name server    mapper                   node
        "host4"                                         "host6"

Resolve an IPv4 address for host6

---> Query of 'A' record for "host6".

only 'AAAA' record is resolved.

---> Request one IPv4 address correspond to
                                the IPv6 address.

Assign on IPv4 address.

<--- Reply with the IPv4 address.

Create 'A' record for the IPv4 address.

<--- Reply with the 'A' record.

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 6]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

IPv4    extension      address    translator    IPv6
        node    name server    mapper                   node
        "host4"                                         "host6"

Send data to host6

=============================> IPv4 data

Try translating but don't
                                          know how to translate it.

<--- Request IPv6 addresses
 corresond to the IPv4 source
 address and to the IPv4
 destination address.

One IPv6 address correspond to the IPv4
                                destination address is already
                                available. Assign one IPv6 address for
                                the IPv4 source address.

---> Reply with the IPv6 source
                                           address and the IPv6
                                           destination address.

Translate IPv4 to IPv6.

===> IPv6 data

Reply data to
                                                        host4

<=== IPv6 data

Translate IPv6 to IPv4

<============================== IPv6 data

3.2 Communication from an IPv6 node to an IPv4 node

In a case where communication is triggered by "host6", its query to
    resolve 'AAAA' record for "host4" is eventually delivered to one of
    extension name servers. After interaction is symmetric to the case
    described in Sention 3.1.

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 7]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

4. Security Consideration

Header conversions of AH [AH] and ESP [ESP] are cryptographically
    impossible. This is a big disadvantage of header conversion router
    approach. On the other hand, it is possible to use AH and ESP in
    proxy gateway approach.

5. References

[AH] Stephen Kent and Randall Atkinson, "IP Authentication Header",
        Internet-Draft, July 1997.

[ESP] Stephen Kent and Randall Atkinson, "IP Encapsulating Security
        Payload (ESP)", Internet-Draft, July 1997.

[HDRCNV] Erik Nordmark, "IPv4/IPv6 Stateless Header Translator",
        Inernet-Draft, July 1997.

[IPV4] J. Postel, "Internet Protocol", RFC 791, September 1981.

[IPV6] S. Deering and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
        (IPv6) Specification", RFC 1883, January 1996.

[TRANS-MECH] R. Gilligan and E. Nordmark, "Transition Mechanisms for
        IPv6 Hosts and Routers", RFC 1933, April 1996.

10. Author's Addresses

Kazuaki TSUCHIYA
    Hitachi, Ltd.
    Hitachi Systemplaza Shinkawasaki
    890 Kashimada, Saiwai, Kawasaki, 211 Japan

Phone: +81-44-549-1714
    Fax:   +81-44-549-1721
    Email: tsuchi@isrd.hitachi.co.jp

Munechika SUMIKAWA
    Office Systems Division, Hitachi, Ltd.
    810 Shimoimaizumi, Ebina-shi 243-04 JAPAN

Phone: +81-462-35-2111
    FAX:   +81-462-35-8325
    EMail: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp

Tsuchiya      draft-tsuchiya-ipv4-ipv6-translator-00.txt      [Page 8]
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                                           November 1997

Ken WATANABE
    Hitachi, Ltd.
    Hitachi Systemplaza Shinkawasaki
    890 Kashimada, Saiwai, Kawasaki, 211 Japan

Phone: +81-44-549-1714
    Fax:   +81-44-549-1721
    Email: nabeken@isrd.hitachi.co.jp

Yoshifumi ATARASHI
    Office Systems Division, Hitachi, Ltd.
    810 Shimoimaizumi, Ebina-shi 243-04 JAPAN

Phone: +81-462-35-2111
    FAX:   +81-462-35-8325
    EMail: atarashi@ebina.hitachi.co.jp

Takahisa MIYAMOTO
    Hitachi, Ltd.
    Hitachi Systemplaza Shinkawasaki
    890 Kashimada, Saiwai, Kawasaki, 211 Japan

Phone: +81-44-549-1714
    Fax:   +81-44-549-1721
    Email: t-miyamo@isrd.hitachi.co.jp

Kazu YAMAMOTO
    Nara Institute of Science and Technology
    8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma City 630-01 JAPAN

Phone: +81-7437-2-5322
    FAX:   +81-7437-2-5329
    EMail: Kazu@Mew.org

Jun MURAI
    Keio University
    5322 Endo, Fujisawa 252 JAPAN

Phone: +81-466-47-5111
 Fax: +81-466-49-1101
 EMail: jun@wide.ad.jp</pre>

A Communication Mechanism between IPv4 and IPv6

Expires in six month K. Watanabe, Hitachi Y. Atarashi, Hi...

Use of VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Enterprise Networks

Tukiyooo 0 Easy Explanation Of IPv4, IPv4, IPv4/IPv6, IPv6 18:59

Network Working Group                                           T. Chown 
Request for Comments: 4554                     University of Southampton 
Category: Informational                                        June 2006 
 
 
     Use of VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Enterprise Networks 
 
Status of This Memo 
 
   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does 
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this 
   memo is unlimited. 
 
Copyright Notice 
 
   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). 
 
Abstract 
 
   Ethernet VLANs are quite commonly used in enterprise networks for the 
   purposes of traffic segregation.  This document describes how such 
   VLANs can be readily used to deploy IPv6 networking in an enterprise, 
   which focuses on the scenario of early deployment prior to 
   availability of IPv6-capable switch-router equipment.  In this 
   method, IPv6 may be routed in parallel with the existing IPv4 in the 
   enterprise and delivered at Layer 2 via VLAN technology.  The IPv6 
   connectivity to the enterprise may or may not enter the site via the 
   same physical link. 
 
Table of Contents 
 
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 
   2.  Enabling IPv6 per Link  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 
       2.1.  IPv6 Routing over VLANs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 
       2.2.  One VLAN per Router Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 
       2.3.  Collapsed VLANs on a Single Interface . . . . . . . . . . 4 
       2.4.  Congruent IPv4 and IPv6 Subnets . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 
       2.5.  IPv6 Addressing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 
       2.6.  Final IPv6 Deployment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 
   3.  Example VLAN Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 
   5.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 
   6.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 
   Appendix A.  Configuration Example  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 1] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
1.  Introduction 
 
   Ethernet VLANs are quite commonly used in enterprise networks for the 
   purposes of traffic segregation.  This document describes how such 
   VLANs can be readily used to deploy IPv6 networking in an enterprise, 
   including the scenario of early deployment prior to availability of 
   IPv6-capable switch-router equipment, where IPv6 may be routed in 
   parallel with the existing IPv4 in the enterprise and delivered to 
   the desired LANs via VLAN technology. 
 
   It is expected that in the long run, sites migrating to dual-stack 
   networking will either upgrade existing switch-router equipment to 
   support IPv6 or procure new equipment that supports IPv6.  If a site 
   already has production routers deployed that support IPv6, the 
   procedures described in this document are not required.  In the 
   interim, however, a method is required for early IPv6 adopters that 
   enables IPv6 to be deployed in a structured, managed way to some or 
   all of an enterprise network that currently lacks IPv6 support in its 
   core infrastructure. 
 
   The IEEE 802.1Q VLAN standard allows separate LANs to be deployed 
   over a single bridged LAN, by inserting "Virtual LAN" tagging or 
   membership information into Ethernet frames.  Hosts and switches that 
   support VLANs effectively allow software-based reconfiguration of 
   LANs through configuration of the tagging parameters.  The software 
   control means that VLANs can be used to alter the LAN infrastructure 
   without having to physically alter the wiring between the LAN 
   segments and Layer 3 routers. 
 
   Many IPv4 enterprise networks are utilising VLAN technology.  Where a 
   site does not have IPv6-capable Layer 2/3 switch-router equipment, 
   but VLANs are supported, a simple yet effective method exists to 
   gradually introduce IPv6 to some or all of that site's network, in 
   advance of the site's core infrastructure having dual-stack 
   capability. 
 
   If such a site wishes to introduce IPv6, it may do so by deploying a 
   parallel IPv6 routing infrastructure (which is likely to be a 
   different platform to the site's main infrastructure equipment, i.e., 
   one that supports IPv6 where the existing equipment does not), and 
   then using VLAN technology to "overlay" IPv6 links onto existing IPv4 
   links.  This can be achieved without needing any changes to the IPv4 
   configuration.  The VLANs don't need to differentiate between IPv4 
   and IPv6; the deployment is just dual-stack, as Ethernet is without 
   VLANs. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 2] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
   The IPv4 default route to the VLAN is provided by one (IPv4) router, 
   while the IPv6 default route to the VLAN is provided by a different 
   (IPv6) router.  The IPv6 router can provide native IPv6 connectivity 
   to the whole site with just a single physical interface, thanks to 
   VLAN tagging and trunking, as described below. 
 
   The IPv6 connectivity to the enterprise may or may not enter the site 
   via the same physical link as the IPv4 traffic, and may be native or 
   tunneled from the external provider to the IPv6 routing equipment. 
 
   This VLAN usage is a solution adopted by a number of sites already, 
   including that of the author. 
 
   It should be noted that a parallel infrastructure will require 
   additional infrastructure and thus cost, and will often require a 
   separate link into the site (from an IPv6 provider), quite possibly 
   tunneled, that will require the site's security policy to be applied 
   (e.g., firewalling and intrusion detection).  For sites that believe 
   early adoption of IPv6 is important, that price is one they may be 
   quite willing to pay.  However, this document focuses on the 
   technical issues of VLAN usage in such a scenario. 
 
2.  Enabling IPv6 per Link 
 
   The precise method by which IPv6 would be "injected" into the 
   existing IPv4 network is deployment specific.  For example, perhaps a 
   site has an IPv4-only router, connected to an Ethernet switch that 
   supports VLANs and a number of hosts connected to that VLAN.  Let's 
   further assume that the site has a dozen of these setups that it 
   wishes to IPv6-enable immediately.  This could be done by upgrading 
   the twelve routers to support IPv6, and turning IPv6 on those 
   routers.  However, this may not be practical for various reasons. 
 
   The simplest approach would be to connect an IPv6 router with one 
   interface to an Ethernet switch, and connect that switch to other 
   switches, and then use VLAN tags between the switches and the IPv6 
   router to "reach" all the IPv4-only subnets from the IPv6 router. 
   Thus, the general principle is that the IPv6 router device (e.g., 
   performing IPv6 Router Advertisements [1] in the case of stateless 
   autoconfiguration) is connected to the target link through the use of 
   VLAN-capable Layer 2 equipment. 
 
2.1.  IPv6 Routing over VLANs 
 
   In a typical scenario where connectivity is to be offered to a number 
   of existing IPv6 internal subnets, one IPv6 router could be deployed, 
   with both an external interface and one or more internal interfaces. 
   The external interface connects to the wider IPv6 internet, and may 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 3] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
   be dual-stack if some tunnel mechanism is used for external 
   connectivity, or IPv6-only if a native external connection is 
   available. 
 
   The internal interface(s) can be connected directly to a VLAN-capable 
   switch.  It is then possible to write VLAN tags on the packets sent 
   from the internal router interface based on the target IPv6 link 
   prefix.  The VLAN-tagged traffic is then transported across the 
   internal VLAN-capable site infrastructure to the target IPv6 links 
   (which may be dispersed widely across the site network). 
 
   Where the IPv6 router is unable to VLAN-tag the packets, a protocol- 
   based VLAN can be created on the VLAN-capable device connected to the 
   IPv6 router, causing IPv6 traffic to be tagged and then redistributed 
   on (congruent) IPv4 subnet links that lie in the same VLAN. 
 
2.2.  One VLAN per Router Interface 
 
   The VLAN marking may be done in different ways.  Some sites may 
   prefer to use one router interface per VLAN; for example, if there 
   are three internal IPv6 links, a standard PC-based IPv6 router with 
   four Ethernet ports could be used, one for the external link and 
   three for the internal links.  In such a case, one switch port would 
   be needed per link, to receive the connectivity from each router 
   port. 
 
   In such a deployment, the IPv6 routing could be cascaded through 
   lower-tier internal IPv6-only routers.  Here, the internal-facing 
   ports on the IPv6 edge router may feed other IPv6 routers over IPv6- 
   only links, which in turn inject the IPv6 connectivity (the stub 
   links using 64-bit subnet prefixes and associated Router 
   Advertisements) into the VLANs. 
 
2.3.  Collapsed VLANs on a Single Interface 
 
   Using multiple IPv6 routers and one port per IPv6 link (i.e., VLAN) 
   may be unnecessary.  Many devices now support VLAN tagging based on 
   virtual interfaces such that multiple IPv6 VLANs could be assigned 
   (trunked) from one physical router interface port.  Thus, it is 
   possible to use just one router interface for "aggregated" VLAN 
   trunking from a switch.  This is a far more interesting case for a 
   site planning the introduction of IPv6 to (part of) its site network. 
 
   This approach is viable while the IPv6 traffic load is light.  As 
   traffic volume grows, the single collapsed interface could be 
   extended to utilise two or more physical ports, where the capacity of 
   the IPv6 router device allows it. 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 4] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
2.4.  Congruent IPv4 and IPv6 Subnets 
 
   Such a VLAN-based technique can be used to deploy IPv6-only VLANs in 
   an enterprise network.  However, most enterprises will be interested 
   in dual-stack IPv4-IPv6 networking. 
 
   In such a case, the IPv6 connectivity may be injected into the 
   existing IPv4 VLANs, such that the IPv4 and IPv6 subnets are 
   congruent (i.e., they coincide exactly when superimposed).  Such a 
   method may have desirable administrative properties; for example, the 
   devices in each IPv4 subnet will be in the same IPv6 subnets also. 
   This is the method used at the author's site. 
 
   Furthermore, IPv6-only devices may be gradually added into the subnet 
   without any need to resize the IPv6 subnet (which may hold in effect 
   an infinite number of hosts in a /64 in contrast to IPv4 where the 
   subnet size is often relatively limited, or kept to a minimum 
   possibly due to address space usage concerns).  The lack of 
   requirement to periodically resize an IPv6 subnet is a useful 
   administrative advantage for IPv6. 
 
2.5.  IPv6 Addressing 
 
   One site using this VLAN technique has chosen to number its IPv6 
   links with the format [Site IPv6 prefix]:[VLAN ID]::/64.  The VLAN 
   tag is 16 bits, so this can work with a typical maximum 48-bit site 
   prefix.  Linking the VLAN ID into a site's addressing scheme may not 
   fit topology and aggregation, and thus is not necessarily a 
   recommended addressing plan, but some sites may wish to consider its 
   usage. 
 
2.6.  Final IPv6 Deployment 
 
   The VLAN technique for IPv6 deployment offers a more structured 
   alternative to opportunistic per-host intra-site tunnelling methods 
   such as Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol ISATAP [2]. 
   It has the ability to offer a simple yet efficient method for early 
   IPv6 deployment to an enterprise site. 
 
   When the site acquires IPv6-capable switch-router equipment, the 
   VLAN-based method can still be used for delivery of IPv6 links to 
   physical switch interfaces, just as it is commonly used today for 
   IPv4 subnets, but with a common routing infrastructure. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 5] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
3.  Example VLAN Topology 
 
   The following figure shows how a VLAN topology may be used to 
   introduce IPv6 in an enterprise network, using a parallel IPv6 
   routing infrastructure and VLAN tagging. 
 
                       External IPv6 Internet 
                                 | 
                                 | 
                        IPv6 Access Router 
                                 | 
                                 | 
                   Switch-router with VLAN support 
                                 | 
                                 | 
                  +--------------+----------------+ 
                  |Site enterprise infrastructure | 
                  |   with support for VLANs      | 
                  +----+--------------------+-----+ 
                       |                    | 
                       |                    | 
                 VLAN switch A         VLAN switch B 
                   |        |               | 
                   |        |               | 
               Subnet1    Subnet2        Subnet3 
 
         Figure 1: IPv6 deployment using VLANs (physical diagram) 
 
   In this scenario, the IPv6 access router has one physical port facing 
   toward the internal infrastructure.  In this example, it need only be 
   IPv6-enabled, as its purpose is solely to handle IPv6 traffic for the 
   enterprise.  The access router has an additional interface facing 
   toward the external infrastructure, which in this example could be 
   dual-stack if the external IPv6 connectivity is via a tunnel to an 
   IPv6 ISP. 
 
   A number of VLANs are handled by the internal-facing IPv6 router 
   port; in this case, IPv6 links Subnet1, Subnet2, Subnet3.  The VLANs 
   are seen as logical subinterfaces of the physical interface on the 
   IPv6 access router, which is using the "collapsed VLAN" method 
   described above, tagging the inbound traffic with one of three VLAN 
   IDs depending on the target IPv6 Subnet prefix. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 6] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
   The following figure shows how the IPv6 view of the deployment looks; 
   all IPv6 subnets are on-link to the IPv6 access router, whether or 
   not they share the same physical links over the VLAN infrastructure. 
 
                     External IPv6 Internet 
                                | 
                                | 
                     Site IPv6 Access Router 
                       |        |         | 
                       |        |         | 
                    Subnet1  Subnet2   Subnet3 
 
           Figure 2: IPv6 view of the deployment (logical view) 
 
   In this example, the router acts as an IPv6 first-hop access router 
   to the physical links, separately from the IPv4 first-hop router. 
   This technique allows a site to easily "inject" native IPv6 into all 
   the links where a VLAN-capable infrastructure is available, enabling 
   partial or full IPv6 deployment on the wire in a site. 
 
4.  Security Considerations 
 
   There are no additional security considerations particular to this 
   method of enabling IPv6 on a link. 
 
   Where the IPv6 connectivity is delivered into the enterprise network 
   by a different path from the IPv4 connectivity, care should be given 
   that equivalent application of security policy (e.g., firewalling) is 
   made to the IPv6 path. 
 
5.  Acknowledgements 
 
   The author would like to thank colleagues on the 6NET project, where 
   this technique for IPv4-IPv6 coexistence is widely deployed, in 
   particular Pekka Savola (CSC/FUNET), but also including Janos Mohacsi 
   (Hungarnet), Martin Dunmore and Chris Edwards (Lancaster University), 
   Christian Strauf (JOIN Project, University of Muenster), and Stig 
   Venaas (UNINETT). 
 
6.  Informative References 
 
   [1]  Narten, T., Nordmark, E., and W. Simpson, "Neighbor Discovery 
        for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December 1998. 
 
   [2]  Templin, F., Gleeson, T., Talwar, M., and D. Thaler, "Intra-Site 
        Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP)", RFC 4214, 
        October 2005. 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 7] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
Appendix A.  Configuration Example 
 
   This section describes a configuration example for using a computer 
   running the FreeBSD variant of the Berkeley Software Distribution 
   (BSD) operating system as a router to deploy IPv6 networking across a 
   number of IPv6 links on an enterprise (in this case, six links), for 
   a scenario similar to the one described above.  Here, the precise 
   configuration may of course vary depending on the existing site VLAN 
   deployment.  This section highlights that the VLAN configuration must 
   be manually configured; the support is not "automatic". 
 
   In this example, the configuration is for an IPv6 BSD router 
   connected directly to a site's external IPv6 access router.  The BSD 
   router has one interface (dc0) toward the site IPv6 access router, 
   and three interfaces (dc1, dc2, dc3) over which the internal routing 
   is performed (the number of interfaces can be varied; three are used 
   here to distribute the traffic load).  The IPv6 documentation prefix 
   (2001:db8::/32) is used in the example. 
 
--- Example IPv6 VLAN configuration, FreeBSD --- 
 
# 
# To IPv6 enable a vlan 
# 
# 1. Add a new vlan device to cloned_interfaces called vlanX 
# 
# 2. Add an ifconfig_vlanX line, the number is the vlan tag ID 
# 
# 3. Add vlanX to ipv6_network_interfaces 
# 
# 4. Add an ipv6_ifconfig_vlanX line, with a new unique prefix 
# 
# 5. Add vlanX to rtadvd_interface 
# 
# 6. Add vlanX to ipv6_router_flags 
 
### Interfaces ### 
 
# Bring physical interfaces up 
ifconfig_dc0="up" 
ifconfig_dc1="up" 
ifconfig_dc2="up" 
ifconfig_dc3="up" 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 8] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
# Create VLan interfaces 
cloned_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 vlan4 vlan5 vlan6" 
 
# Upstream link to IPv6 Access Router 
ifconfig_vlan0="vlan 37 vlandev dc0" 
 
# Downstream interfaces, load balance over interfaces dc1,dc2,dc3 
ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 11 vlandev dc1" # Subnet1 
ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 17 vlandev dc2" # Subnet2 
ifconfig_vlan3="vlan 24 vlandev dc3" # Subnet3 
ifconfig_vlan4="vlan 25 vlandev dc1" # Subnet4 
ifconfig_vlan5="vlan 34 vlandev dc2" # Subnet5 
ifconfig_vlan6="vlan 14 vlandev dc3" # Subnet6 
 
### IPv6 ### 
 
# Enable ipv6 
ipv6_enable="YES" 
 
# Forwarding 
ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" 
 
# Define Interfaces 
ipv6_network_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 vlan4 vlan5 vlan6" 
# Define addresses 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan0="2001:db8:d0:101::2 prefixlen 64" # Uplink 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan1="2001:db8:d0:111::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet1 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan2="2001:db8:d0:112::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet2 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan3="2001:db8:d0:121::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet3 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan4="2001:db8:d0:113::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet4 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan5="2001:db8:d0:114::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet5 
ipv6_ifconfig_vlan6="2001:db8:d0:115::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet6 
 
# Router advertisements 
rtadvd_enable="YES" 
rtadvd_interfaces="-s vlan0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 vlan4 vlan5 vlan6" 
 
### Routing ### 
 
# Multicast 
mroute6d_enable="YES" 
mroute6d_program="/sbin/pim6sd" 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                      [Page 9] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
# RIP-ng 
ipv6_router_enable="YES" 
ipv6_router_flags="-N dc0,dc1,dc2,dc3, vlan1,vlan2,vlan3, 
                   vlan4,vlan5,vlan6" 
 
--- End of configuration --- 
 
   Note that if there was only one internal-facing interface, then again 
   so long as the OS supported VLAN trunking, all the VLAN IDs could be 
   associated to that interface (dc1, for example). 
 
   The VLAN IDs need to be managed by the site administrator, but would 
   probably already be assigned for existing IPv4 subnets (ones into 
   which IPv6 is being introduced). 
 
   For a large enterprise, a combination of internal tunnels and VLAN 
   usage could be used; the whole site need not be enabled by VLAN 
   tagging alone.  This choice is one for the site administrator to 
   make. 
 
Author's Address 
 
   Tim Chown 
   University of Southampton 
   Southampton, Hampshire  SO17 1BJ 
   United Kingdom 
 
   EMail: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                     [Page 10] 
 
RFC 4554            VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence            June 2006 
 
 
Full Copyright Statement 
 
   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). 
 
   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions 
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors 
   retain all their rights. 
 
   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an 
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS 
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET 
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, 
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE 
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED 
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 
 
Intellectual Property 
 
   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any 
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to 
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in 
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights 
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has 
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information 
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be 
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. 
 
   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any 
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an 
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of 
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this 
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at 
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr. 
 
   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any 
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary 
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement 
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at 
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org. 
 
Acknowledgement 
 
   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF 
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chown                        Informational                     [Page 11]

Use of VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Enterprise Networks

Network Working Group T. Chown Request for Comments: 4554 University of South...

How to add IPv6 over IPv4 support to your network behind a NAT router

IPv6 multicast address assignment with DHCPv6

Converting IPv4 addresses to IPv6 addresses

How To Setup IPv6

A Communication Mechanism between IPv4 and IPv6

Use of VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Enterprise Networks

ADV

Populars

Arsip Blog